Answering research questions without calculating the mean

نویسنده

  • Guillermo Campitelli
چکیده

In an important theoretical article Speelman and McGann (2013) indicated that psychological researchers tend to use statistical procedures that involve calculating the mean of a variable in an uncritical manner. A typical procedure in psychological research consists of calculating the mean of some dependent variable in two or more samples and to present those means as summaries of the samples. The next step is to use some statistical technique (e.g., t-test, ANOVA) in order to be able to determine the probability of finding the observed differences betweenmeans in those samples given that the difference between the means of the populations from which the samples were extracted is zero. If this probability is very low (i.e., <0.05) the psychological researcher decides that the difference between the means of the populations of interest is not zero. This procedure—the null hypothesis statistical significance testing (NHST) procedure–has received a huge number of criticisms, which are beyond the scope of this article. However, I would like to present the anecdote told by Cohen (1994), not only to criticize the NHST procedure itself but also the uncritical manner in which the procedure is used. Cohen tells us that a colleague hypothesized that a rare disease did not exist in a population; he then collected a sample of 30 individuals and found that one of them had the disease. He then wondered what type of significance test should be used in this situation. Obviously, the existence of one case with the disease is enough evidence to refute the hypothesis, but the uncritical search for a hypothesis testing procedure precluded the researcher from seeing the obvious. This anecdote nicely dovetails with Speelman and McGann’s (2013) assertion that psychological researchers tend to use procedures that involve calculating means in an uncritical manner. The goal of this article is to emphasize that there are procedures that do not involve calculating means, which are perfectly sound to answer research questions. In the following sections I will present the endeavor that other colleagues in the field of psychology of expertise and I embarked on with the purpose of testing hypotheses of the deliberate practice framework (Ericsson et al., 1993). I will present four measures that did not involve calculating the mean (i.e., variability, a value, a case, and distributions) I have used in my research to answer research questions. Before that I briefly explain the deliberate practice framework.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Ethical questions have no moral answers Evidence that &quot;ethic&quot; based on &quot;metaphysical foundations&quot;

"Is ethic based on metaphysical principles?" Hillary Putnam and Kai Nielsen answer to this question is negative; On the contrary, from the point of view of this article, the answer to this question is positive. Many scholars of Islamic ethic have also given an implicit positive answer to this important question. One of the important evidences that shows that ethic is based on metaphysical princ...

متن کامل

What do You Mean? Finding Answers to Complex Questions

This paper illustrates ongoing research and issues faced when dealing with real-time questions in the domain of Reusable Launch Vehicles (aerospace engineering). The question-answering system described in this paper is used in a collaborative learning environment with real users and live questions. The paper describes an analysis of these more complex questions as well as research to include th...

متن کامل

ارایه یک پیکره‌ پرسش و پاسخ مذهبی در زبان فارسی

Question answering system is a field in natural language processing and information retrieval noticed by researchers in these decades. Due to a growing interest in this field of research, the need to have appropriate data sources is perceived. Most researches about developing question answering corpus area have been done in English so far, but in other languages as Persian, the lack of these co...

متن کامل

Boosting Passage Retrieval through Reuse in Question Answering

Question Answering (QA) is an emerging important field in Information Retrieval. In a QA system the archive of previous questions asked from the system makes a collection full of useful factual nuggets. This paper makes an initial attempt to investigate the reuse of facts contained in the archive of previous questions to help and gain performance in answering future related factoid questions. I...

متن کامل

ارزیابی منابع اطلاعاتی پزشکی مبتنی بر شواهد براساس میزان پاسخدهی به پرسش‌های بالینی

 Introduction: This study was to identify the best accessible electronic information resources for finding answers to clinical questions in Iranian National Medical Digital Library. Methods: 20 clinical questions were randomly selected from four areas: prevention and treatment, diagnosis, etiology and prognosis from American National Library of Medicine (NLM). The keywords were searched in info...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 6  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015